of Interest! - the Carleton Newsletter

October 1995 -- Volume 12 Issue 5



State Law Changes...................

* OREGON *

Effective: January 1, 1996 *** Law Type: Credit Insurance

There will be a reduction in prima facie credit life and disability rates on January 1, 1996. The change is the result of a review of experience data by the Director of Insurance as specified in OAR 836-60-041(5).

CREDIT LIFE INSURANCE

Initial Indebtedness LESS THAN $3,000:

        Single Decreasing Life - $ .47/$100/yr
        Single Level Life -      $ .85/$100/yr

        Single M.O.B. Rate -     $ .72/$1000/mo

For loan terms exceeding 63 months, the rate is the actuarial equivalent of the M.O.B. rate at the term of the contract.

Initial Indebtedness of $3,000 OR MORE:

        Single Decreasing Life - $ .42/$100/yr
        Single Level Life -      $ .76/$100/yr

        Single M.O.B. Rate -     $ .65/$1000/mo

For loan terms exceeding 63 months, the rate is the actuarial equivalent of the M.O.B. rate at the term of the contract.

Joint life is 165% of the corresponding rounded single life rate.

CREDIT DISABILITY (A&H) INSURANCE

Rates are per $100 of coverage

Initial Indebtedness LESS THAN $3,000
Retroactive Non-Retroactive
Term 14 Day 30 Day 14 Day 30 Day
12 $2.07 $1.92 $1.71 $1.25
24 $2.93 $2.69 $2.55 $2.05
36 $3.67 $3.37 $3.25 $2.74
48 $4.32 $3.96 $3.86 $3.34
60 $4.87 $4.48 $4.36 $3.84
72 $5.35 $4.93 $4.80 $4.31
84 $5.76 $5.33 $5.17 $4.70
96 $6.12 $5.68 $5.49 $5.05
108 $6.43 $6.00 $5.77 $5.35
120 $6.71 $6.29 $6.03 $5.63

Initial Indebtedness of $3,000 OR MORE
Retroactive Non-Retroactive
Term 14 Day 30 Day 14 Day 30 Day
12 $1.92 $1.77 $1.59 $1.16
24 $2.72 $2.49 $2.36 $1.91
36 $3.41 $3.12 $2.98 $2.55
48 $4.01 $3.67 $3.58 $3.10
60 $4.52 $4.16 $4.05 $3.56
72 $4.96 $4.57 $4.45 $4.00
84 $5.35 $4.95 $4.80 $4.36
96 $5.68 $5.27 $5.09 $4.68
108 $5.96 $5.57 $5.36 $4.96
120 $6.22 $5.84 $5.59 $5.22


From Our Research Dept.........

The "Elusive Final Payment" - Part I

We recently went to work trying to reconcile a credit transaction for a customer that was generated from their "system". The transaction in question seemed simple enough, the basic data were as follows:


         36 month transaction term
         $5,000.00 Amount Financed
         21% Simple Interest Rate
         1 month to the 1st payment date

Unfortunately, we initially received a copy of the completed contract form via fax. You know how you have those days when modern technology is more hindrance than help? Well, this was one of "those days". The most legible numbers were in the condition that 3's, 6's, 8's and 9's were pretty much interchangeable. If you have dealt with a facsimile machine much at all, you know what I'm talking about.

However, our intrepid research staff attempted to dig in to the calculations as best they could. The only portion of the contract initially readable was the Truth-in-Lending "Fed Box". We checked off items one by one. The disclosed A.P.R. appeared okay at 20.99% (we wondered why it deviated from the contract rate by even .01, but that was a fine tuning issue to worry about later). The Amount Financed seemed fine at $5,000.00. However, the Finance Charge and Total of Payments were causing some concern.

We derived from the above information that the full precision payment was $188.37533681, which would properly truncate to $188.37. Truncation ensures we are not charging for even an iota greater than the 21% we assumed was contracted for.

Using a payment of $188.37, we calculated a Finance Charge of $1,781.32 and a Total of Payments of $6,781.32. However, the Finance Charge was disclosed as $1,785.45 and the Total of Payments disclosed as $6,785.45.

The $4.13 difference in Finance Charge was a concern. When analyzing transactions made with certain assumptions, it is usually easier to reconcile thousands of dollars than just a few. In fact, a standard rule of thumb is that the smaller the difference, the more difficult to reconcile.

A quick telephone call confirmed that this transaction did include 35 regular payments and an odd final payment. We finally reconciled the transaction to our satisfaction and we will share our conclusions with you in the December issue.

For now, we pose the question: Which of the following values would your system or calculation tool produce from the data supplied at the beginning of the article?

Given 35 "regular" monthly payments of $188.37, what final payment would your system disclose if all payments were made as scheduled?

(We will give you a clue to our conclusion. The final payment we arrived at is among the following.)

Possible Final Payments
$190.21$192.50$189.37 $186.26$188.47
$185.34$187.51$184.38 $181.21$194.00
$190.96$193.24$188.37 $188.63$200.01

Happy Computing!


Distribution of this newsletter is made with the understanding that the information contained herein has not been certified as legally acceptable for any particular statute, law, or regulation. For more timely and detailed information, subscribe to our Consumer Finance Newsletter and/or The Cost of Personal Borrowing in the United States compliance guide which are both published and updated ten times a year.

Carleton
The most respected name in financial computational
products and services for more than 25 years.
  • Rate Charts
  • Handheld Computers
  • PC Software
  • Document Processing
  • Calculating Generator
  • Consulting
  • Supplies and Service

Carleton ... Compliance - Accuracy - Reliability


    3975 William Richardson Drive
South Bend, IN 46628-9752
Phone (800) 433-0090
    Post Office Box 570
South Bend, IN 46624-0570
Fax (574) 243-6060

Copyright ©2008 Carleton Inc.